Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | baobabKoodaa's commentslogin

Best of luck with your folksy mom & pop DRAM factory.

I'm confused. When you say that hedge funds "price out" regular people, what do you mean? Price out of what?

Of the housing market? That seems to be what GP said, doesn’t it?

They create demand which increases price. Plus they can afford to hold their asset longer, this reducing supply.

LangChain does not solve any actual problem, so there is no need to replace it with anything. Just build without it.

I don't know! I guess we'll have to wait for next year's Indie Game awards to see which prizes they retract that time and why. This is dumb.

I stopped using Brave after they began to shove ads into the splash screen.


That is also easily disabled. I think there are five or six things that I need to disable in a fresh Brave installation and then it's perfect.


They also support Group Policy and JSON based configurations, depending on the OS. So you could install a config that disables a lot of that before you even install the Brave Browser.

Heck, they could probably sell that as a premium/business feature for extra funding (hint hint if anyone from Brave reads this).


I can stop any time I want, and in fact I am going to stop. Just one more (bug)fix.


This joke is getting old kinda Opus4.5 handles all the bugs in one go and also doesn’t introduce new ones at least for me. Very rarely i get stuck with it like i did with past generations of AI


How long the usual self debugging cycle ? it seems to be around 10 minutes for me (untyped language)


CloudFlare is the main censorship provider on the internet. I don't know what you're asking?


I don't see that assertion substantiated e.g. on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudflare

And anyway, Cloudflare can censor a site only if the site owner requests or allows, right?


No. CloudFlare was at one point proudly making luvlic statements about censoring nazis.


Cloudflare could "censor" DailyStormer only because DailyStormer themselves put Cloudflare in front of their services. Same with Polymarket.


You're moving the goalpost here. The claim I was responding to was:

> Cloudflare can censor a site only if the site owner requests or allows, right?

This is different than what you're saying:

> Cloudflare could "censor" DailyStormer only because DailyStormer themselves put Cloudflare in front of their services. Same with Polymarket.

Yes, you are correct that Cloudflare can only censor their own customers. But that is a different point than the one I was responding to.


We know because reports on the Polymarket Discord began with reports about Cloudflare blocking, and later on Polymarket added the trading restriction on their end. If the initiative to block had come from Polymarket, these events would have unfolded in reverse order.


If they actually cared about how they impact people, the minimum they could do is give 24 hours warning to exit positions. This shows they absolutely do not care.


I'll do one better: I poop every day in the water closet!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: