We still have chess grandmasters if you have noticed..

Yes, and we'll continue to have human coding competitions for entertainment purpose. Good luck trying to live off the prize money though.

Hikaru makes good money streaming on Twitch tho

so you're telling me there will be money for about 100 top streaming programmers

I feel like they are trying let public invent the product they will work on..

I don't understand why add another domain-specific command to a container manager and go out of scope for what the tool was designed for at first place.

The main benefit I see for cloud platforms: caching/co-hosting various services based on model instead of (model + user's API layer on top).

For the end user, it would be one less deployment headache to worry about: not having to package ollama + the model into docker containers for deployment. Also a more standardized deployment for hardware accelerated models across platforms.

gotta have an AI strategy to report to the board

(disclaimer: I'm leading the Docker Model Runner team at Docker)

It's fine to disagree of course, but we envision Docker as a tool that has a higher abstraction level than just container management. That's why having a new domain-specific command (that also uses domain-specific technology that is independent from containers, at least on some platform targets) is a cohesive design choice from our perspective.

instagram use postgresql and still web-scale (unless this was satire)

I have not watched that video since 2013 (wow!) and it is still hilarious.

they obviously didn't use vanilla postgres, but built some custom sharding on top, which is untrivial task (implementation and maintenance(resharding, failover, replication, etc)).

and that writing says "we need to find investor money before the FOMO is over"

FYI, there is already a type of deployment called "sovereign cloud" where data exports are controlled by the country and already under works by major providers.

QR code per item would be helpful with the printed version probably

Just pick a popular ERP solution and work with an official partner company to that ERP.

how is that different than Dropbox version history?

Plus, for a Linux user, you can already build such a system yourself quite trivially by getting an FTP account, mounting it locally with curlftpfs, and then using SVN or CVS on the mounted filesystem. From Windows or Mac, this FTP account could be accessed through built-in software.

Branches is one example! But really Dropbox is not a VCS. Although some game studios do use Dropbox/Google Drive for versioning graphical assets - but not because it's a good tool for the purpose, they just don't have a better one.

You can also price in the effort of maintenance that needs to be done before adding of a new feature. That may explain it better from the leadership perspective.