Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nalnq's commentslogin

> From a European perspective, FTC independence is a crucial element, because Article 8(3) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR) requires that the processing of personal data is monitored and enforce by an “independent” body.

How do you measure this independence? In IPs (Independence Points)? In Europe all agencies that are similar to the FCC are also independent… in paper, because they all depend on the executive branch.


If the pensions in Italy are anything like in Spain, she’s making more money off it than young people are making working. Plus she’s probably defrauding the pension system by both collecting her pension and working.

Is it defrauding it if you contributed to it all your working life?

A defined benefit pension (or any other retiree benefit such as healthcare) is a claim on future productivity.

“Contributing” cash to it may not be enough, if the cash didn’t convert into sufficient automation to offset declines in humans due to declining birthrates.

So the question gets more interesting if it’s “Was contributing whatever amount calculated (using tenuous assumptions) many decades ago enough, especially if you chose not to have well raised kids who in turn could provide society with the retiree benefits?”

And then that opens up a can of worms about who was and was not expected to have well raised kids, and it gets messy very quickly, yet at the same time, we see a clear macro problem of taking more and more from a smaller young population and giving it to a bigger and bigger old population.


Yes. You can’t work and collect a pension.

You are saying that very matter-of-factly, while that is not how it works here in the Netherlands, and probably also in other places in Europe. The reasoning being, the pension isn't an unemployment benefit, pension is a fund you spent your career investing into.

The Times New Roman commentary could have been true back when it was written, but now Calibri is the default for Microsoft Word, and has been for a long while (almost 20 years). So choosing Calibri is the path of least resistance.

Aptos has been the default font for Microsoft Word since 2023.

With all the fanfare made over Calibri back when it was announced, TIL about Aptos

I enjoyed the argument that this is going to open up a new time point for digital forensics. Many people have doctored documents pretending to have made them in the past. Except they did not realize that the vintage software used font X, but the modern default is now Y. There have been a few court cases where essentially someone is able to say, “This font is clearly Calibri which did not exist at the time this document was supposedly printed.”

If you are a Deep Space 9 fan, this is where you get to scream, “It’s a fake!!!”



The more famous example being the Pakistani Prime Minister forging documents in Calibri dated before its release.

https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-40571708


Aptos is slightly wider and taller but looks very very similar to calibri, especially calibri a point larger.

So now Times New Roman not only looks uninspired and bland, but also dated? Yeah, I would say that's a good fit...

I thought here in HN we agreed that copying information was not stealing? You know, how you are not depriving the original website of their information or anything, because everything can be copied infinitely.

... we agreed that copying information was not stealing if you are the compnay stealing it, but if it is your information that it is being stolen then it is theft and should be treated as such.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: