Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | remarkEon's commentslogin

Because there's a non-trivial element of the current USG (and probably a decent sized portion of American voters) who think we'll be at war with PRC within the next couple years, at some point when the next Taiwan invasion windows open (April and October each year). From that perspective, this is prudent policy. If you don't think this is likely, or don't care about broader historical or geopolitical trends, then yes it's very annoying.

That doesn't explain it, though. In this case and the TikTok case, nobody has been able to cite exactly what all these "personal data" are. Not once have I seen a citation of what TikTok has "stolen" from users, somehow defying data sandboxing implemented on mobile devices.

This fake hysteria over drones is even worse, considering that the drones don't have the means of sending arbitrary data to remote servers.


They do, the DJI app can send whatever it wants. In China, all flight logs are sent to the relevant authority for enforcement.

It can't send "whatever it wants." The user has to grant access to various categories of personal data.

And whatever it sends can and would have been sniffed by now. It's incredible how much time people have to expend on way-more-obscure snooping than that.


If you think that is likely there won't be a USA or much of the rest of the world anyway.

So this whole thing is utterly stupid


> If you think that is likely there won't be a USA or much of the rest of the world anyway

America and China will probably find themselves in a proxy and/or hybrid war before 2035 (unless China stops trying to invade Taiwan).

None of that requries a nuclear exchange, nor even conventional strikes by China on the American homeland or vice versa.


[flagged]


There is nothing to prepare for because the only possible war between the USA and China is a nuclear war and such a war has no victor. Both countries are "prepared" in terms of nuclear weapons.

The USA is clearly not prepared to sacrifice any of its own cities to prevent an invasion of Taiwan.

All this sabre rattling and military buildup only serves to put money in the pockets of the military industrial complex and/or build military capabilities for each country to exert its will within its own sphere of influence.


> There is nothing to prepare for because the only possible war between the USA and China is a nuclear war and such a war has no victor.

I think there are 2 false statements here. First, you could have conventional conflict alone, the same way you had WW2 without extensive use of chemical weapons.

Second, there are possible paths to have a winnable nuclear war, actually, the US did have one a couple of decades ago and it won. I do agree that saying this out loud though is dangerous because the reason for nuclear taboo is also based on the perception of "end of world" it has.


Do you have a link to this?

I'm not the person you asked, but it appears to be a direct quote from this page, previously on HN:

Exploring a space-based, scalable AI infrastructure system design - https://research.google/blog/exploring-a-space-based-scalabl... - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45813267 (Nov 4 2025, 44 points, 73 comments)

> Project Suncatcher is a moonshot exploring a new frontier: equipping solar-powered satellite constellations with TPUs and free-space optical links to one day scale machine learning compute in space.


It’s debatable whether it’s a better use of US power and resources to try to stop PRC from obtaining these chips versus, say, sinking the Chinese fishing fleets actively wrecking entire ecosystems. I probably agree with you that on balance working on the later problem has a higher long term ROI.


Yes, thank you, not enough people know this. Though, it should be inferable from the name. “Copy right” to mean “I/we retain the right to make copies”. Certainly sounds like a publisher right to me.


I haven’t read that book so forgive the ignorant question here, but how am I to parse that title?

“No Rules Rules”, as in “no rules is awesome! It rules!”

Or

“No Rules Rules”, as in “the only rules are that there are no rules”.

The difference in interpretation matters because the tone is quite different.


You use it to boil water.


You can even dissolve the uranium in the water and use the same substance for both fuel and propellant and so capable of reaching far higher temperatures than those that would cause any engine to melt.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_salt-water_rocket


The real question is if we'll get back hole or antimatter powered steam engines before GTA 6


It's almost a meme at this point


Others have commented on why Howard should be well known if you live here.

The whole point of the United States government existing is, supposedly, for the betterment of its citizens. From time to time, its worth debating from first principles whether or not existing immigration policy - or any policy, really - actually does this. Given the unemployment rate for recent STEM grads in the US, I think it's perfectly reasonable to ask some hard questions about whether or not some of these visa schemes are actually doing good in the general sense, and not just in the specific sense of "this AI start up that's really just a ChatGPT wrapper has access to more bodies, so their runway is longer".


How would this be implemented?


It cannot, it's a weird statement by OP.

"Just don't let them hack you"


Add a required header called "insert-seahorse-emoji: " to your API, reject any request that doesn't have it.


The unspoken truth here is that there are inner and outer members of the NATO core. Estonia, I’m sorry to say, is not a country the United States would go to WWIII over. The core members of Germany, France, Poland, Italy, and possibly the Uk remain. Followed by a few others, and then there’s the rest where if Russia invaded journalists across the eastern seaboard would furiously rush to Chat GPT to find out where it is on the map.

All that aside, and regardless of your views on this administration’s posture toward NATO, Europe needs to revitalize its defense industry as there’s been a much remarked on free rider problem for a while. Robert Gates made a now infamous speech about this problem on his way out of office as secretary of defense.


Why not? There’s no right to force everyone on the internet to interact with everyone else.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: