Why aren't those flock cameras being destroyed all the time in the US?

In our city people vandalized speed cameras all the time, so eventually government gave up and just banned them in the whole province. I'm not sure they did that because of being vandalized, but at least there was direct actionable push back.

I'd probably think people getting bills for hundreds in the mail is a good catalyst to take action on a speed camera. A camera that is used for serious crimes, not speeding, is not going to be nearly as inflammatory.

I don't feel sorry for a person that heard all these stories before and didn't say a word, and continued to promoted Apple crap.

"I have contacts in Apple, I'm better than all those losers". Well you were, until you were not.

Can you waimo to another city or to camping?

Probably a big chunk of these tried ACC a few times, found that ACC sucks unless you're on perfectly clean empty highway, and said "screw it I'll drive it myself".

I've played with it a little bit. Seems useful in principle. But a lot of roads I tend to be on--even highways--have a fair bit of traffic and speed limits that change on a pretty regular basis. Hasn't been as useful as I expected it to be.

It's mostly fine but it has no idea of proper positioning on road. It always puts the car in other cars' blind zones, near to trucks etc.

We're good, we give 1hr screening exercise, then ask to improve it on the interview. Coding but not leetcode bs.

Or it's just big corpo policy that everyone except HR hates and is just hard to change.

I like your optimistic theory.

I'm the type to talk with HR about when the company could do something better, and some of them appreciate it.

(Most recent was when a company was starting each Monday morning with a miserable cross-hemisphere all-hands meeting videoconf... that sucked the life out of the recharged energy people came back from the weekend with, for the potentially rewarding work we were doing. The company improved.)

That's a valid military strike, period.

So Australian teens will finally learn how they computers and home wifi works.

That is one positive!

TBH these steps are not that easy and probably are not possible in a federated country like US.

Gerrymandering already exists. Voter suppression was huge in the past, and may become huge again. The supreme court made sure of that.

And also... the supreme court keeps issuing partisan decisions.

So... what is left? Number 3?

I guess you're arguing that federalism protects people, but how does it do that in a way that isn't already being eroded?

There's no voter suppression in US, and it won't stand in courts even if somebody pushes it. Supreme court keeps using partisan decision in favour of Dems and GOP, so it remains balanced. What's left is everything you mentioned.