Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Miracast is much more straightforward and predictable and with 801.11ad you can even go lossless. Also you can get an HDMI receiver for like $15, because it’s just streaming instead of a full stack.

Chromecast will go of the way Google’s many Dodos. And good riddance!



It depends on the use case, I guess. Miracast is good for quick sharing of content stored locally on your phone/laptop, whereas Chromecast is better suited to stream content that is hosted elsewhere, so it doesn't drain your battery.


That’s a single use case and you can just reverse it and have a ‘remote control’ mode on the portable device.

In practice people are now buying Telescreens (not like there’s option tbh) and they have Android or at least Netflix already built in.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: