Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The acronym was defined in the comment to which they were replying (thus two levels above your own reply); it would have been redundant to again define it yet again.


No shade intended. Just found this amusing.

> would have been _redundant_ to _again_ define it yet _again_.


The Department of Redundancy Department informs you that was not an accident.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: