Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Commercial Crew Program is fundamentally different than the way NASA has previously done business

It is exactly the same for SoaceX and Boeing, other than Boeing getting way more money for the same job.

Free-market capitalism is like the Easter bunny - a nice bedtime story for children. It doesn’t exist.



You still missed the point because you want to force this into a “SpaceX vs Everybody” narrative. I’ve already addressed the Boeing point. It still doesn’t negate the point about the industry needing government help/contracts to survive its early stages.

I don’t know why it’s difficult to actually read and critique the point being made, rather than constant digressions into others, but it makes for boring conversation. If you have a point that SpaceX didn’t need government contracts early, then make it. I’d be curious to hear it, but I don’t think the data supports it.


What part of defence contractors or train line builders or oil refineries or corn or sugar growers didn’t need government contracts and subsidies early?

You’re making out like SpaceX are doing something unique or morally wrong, when what they are doing is perfectly common, and the government couldn’t function without companies doing what spacex are doing.

Your message makes no sense. This is everyday stuff across the entire economy.

The only story Is that spacex saved the government (taxpayers) billions compared to paying Boeing who can’t even deliver.


Stop with the textbook whataboutism.

Also show me when I say SpaceX was doing something unique or morally wrong. Was it when I said other contractors do the same? Was it when I pointed out Boeing’s shortcomings? How any when I said SpaceX has done wonderful things for the taxpayer? Or how the public-private partnership works well?

Why do you insist on ignoring all the things we seem to agree on to fabricate an argument? Is it because you are incapable of admitting sometimes the government does good things? You are tilting at windmills, my friend.


So what ARE you saying?

Keep it concise and to the point. Make it worthwhile.


It’s all there in the OP. But since reading comprehension seemed to take a hit due to the need for arguing, I’ll reiterate:

His high-risk bets have largely been buoyed by government contracts

SpaceX wouldn’t have survived without govt intervention. I think the same can be said of Tesla to a lesser extent. That’s not bad, it’s the way things work with high-risk nascent industries.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: