So far you have made four posts in this thread and provided no evidence. Four opportunities to provide data on what you _feel_. Four chances to share links or reports.
And yet, here you are without of that.
As such, it is doubly clear, as described above, that you are insider trading. I hope that you are prosecuted to the fullest extent.
> So far you have made four posts in this thread and provided no evidence. Four opportunities to provide data on what you _feel_. Four chances to share links or reports.
You realize that what you just posted was aiding for supporting corrupt insider trading activities in congress such as [0] and [1] in both parties?
Why do you think a bi-partisan total ban on stocks for all politicians never goes forward? [2] [3] Because at least for (some) congress-people they already know that insider trading and front-running on key information can and does indeed happen.
Which is something you would be against given the Pelosis' and others directly benefitting from this loophole, like the Nvidia [1] and Google trades [3] all timed in connection to key decisions from the government.
> As such, it is doubly clear, as described above, (baseless) that you are insider trading (citation needed). I hope that you are prosecuted to the fullest extent. (no case)
Except I didn't copy or trade on anything. You admitted to what you are (baselessly) accusing me of. Also...
It's extremely more likely that you (not any congress-person) as a retail trader would be investigated and prosecuted (and jailed) for insider trading than any other congress-person, if you knew someone with political insider information and traded on that.
But please continue to defend your politicians front-running you with their insider advantage.
And yet, here you are without of that.
As such, it is doubly clear, as described above, that you are insider trading. I hope that you are prosecuted to the fullest extent.