Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Instead of trash, reimplementing rm (to only really delete after some time or depending on resource usage or to shred of you are paranoid if the goal is to really delete something) or using zfs makes much more sense.


I can't imagine a scenario where I would want to reimplement rm just for this.


[flagged]


https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.

Instead of being rude to a fellow human making an inoffensive remark, you could’ve spent your words being kind and describing the scenario you claim exists. For all you know, maybe they did ask ChatGPT and were unconvinced by the answer.

As a side note, I don’t even understand how your swipe would make sense. If anything, needing ChatGPT is what demonstrates a lack of imagination (having the latter you don’t need the former).


What makes you think I need ChatGPT, since I just wondered whether ChatGPT was as stupid, since obviously I do know why that would be useful?


The idea of changing what 'rm' does sets off all of my "foot-gun" alarm bells


How is this better?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: