If I am wrong I challenge you to point at a well specified replacement for PGP with a diversity of competing implementations as a decentralized cryptographic identity and trust system for open source software supply chain signing, authentication, and peer to peer encryption with a variety of smartcard generation, usage, and backup solutions better for every situation PGP is used in today.

Also a solution that significantly reduces attack surface enough to motivate a migration from PGP in all the areas it is used, and a specific strategy to migrate everything to it.

Also form a standards team to maintain the spec to keep all implementations compatible so this work is useful long term.

If all of that happened I would seriously evaluate it and likely even help promote it. Few understand the shortcomings of PGP better than those of us that heavily rely on it!

Until then I suggest improving upon what already exists, or at the very least stop steering people away from the best effort solutions we have today and all the hard work from hundreds of people that go into maintaining them for free.

I'm not the one insulting Filippo Valsorda, for no apparent reason (any of your points could have been made without criticizing him), when he's not present to defend himself in this thread. The onus is squarely on you here. You won't succeed, though, so I don't blame you for not wasting the time.