Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> As quoted in Futurism, she said the production process took "seven weeks" where the team "hardly slept" and created "thousands of takes - then shaped them in the edit just as we would on any high-craft production".

How else are you going to justify what I assume is a 5-6 figure invoice for essentially doing nothing.

> "This wasn't an AI trick," she said. "It was a film."

Unfortunately you can't trick us with this nonsense. I am pretty sure no editing software was used beyond hammering on a prompt for a weekend.





>>This wasn't an AI trick," she said. "It was a film."

Even this statement reeks of chatGPT.


I must say, my first thought was ChatGPT's signature writing style coming through loud and clear in that statement.

Apparently the reason why chatGPT really likes the “it’s not just x, it’s y” structure is its overuse in marketing copy. Maybe this marketer actually has internalized that structure for real.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: